<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>MattMatros.com - Latest Comments in One Event Down (and out)</title><link>http://mattmatros.disqus.com/</link><description>Matt Matros.com</description><atom:link href="https://mattmatros.disqus.com/one_event_down_and_out/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 09:06:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: One Event Down (and out)</title><link>http://mattmatros.com/?p=296#comment-49890736</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi every friends,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  Did you like play online flash games and nice VIDEO ^_^.  OK!  If you are interesting with it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  Just do a click &lt;a href="http://www.ongamesite.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.ongamesite.com"&gt;http://www.ongamesite.com&lt;/a&gt;.  Good luck!!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Internet games,Computer games,Windows games and nice video&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ongamesite</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 09:06:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: One Event Down (and out)</title><link>http://mattmatros.com/?p=296#comment-32788071</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't know why you're attacking me on my own site, but I'll respond anyway.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;5-betting all-in was definitely an option. Seeing a flop with effectively one bet left is also an option (a fairly common one in tournaments, actually). It's also better to be out-of-position when doing it because you have the option to shove in first.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;64s? What about Axs? What about AK or AQ? It's a board that I can't get away from with one bet left without a strong read.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Finally, I have no idea what your last sentence means, but I'm not all that interested in learning either. It's amazing to me how many people make disparaging comments anonymously on the internet, simply because they disagree with the way a hand of poker was played. At least you actually gave reasons beyond "it was too aggressive" or "it was too early," which were the first two complaints I heard.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jacksup</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:30:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: One Event Down (and out)</title><link>http://mattmatros.com/?p=296#comment-32156232</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I actually wasn't trying to compare him to the villain in the first hand, although I can see how it came out that way. Most of the field was populated by very straightforward players, who are just playing their cards and not really doing that especially well. I wanted to differentiate this villain from all of these peeps. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jacksup</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:49:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: One Event Down (and out)</title><link>http://mattmatros.com/?p=296#comment-32155664</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like how you define the second villain as an "actual poker player"... hence you think the "lag internet player" wasn't; just a spewtard... haha&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thorrr</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:41:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>